Page 3 of 4
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:30 am
by sound world
Here on this site you need to link it to a web host.
But you could always put it up on the Nordenstam Shelter,where it doesn't need a webhost.(If your pic is a .jpg it's probably OK but big files (.tiff etc) won't work.That might be why your Avatar doesn't work.Take it to
http://photobucket.com/ and try from there.)
Then:-
http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/No ... m_shelter/
Join the Shelter first if you haven't already [crazy]
Click on 'Photos' and then 'Add Photo'
then 'Choose file'-when you locate the pic on your computer,
give it a name,eg 'Independent'(where it says 'Name'),
and then hit 'Upload' at the bottom of that page.Wait for it to upload-if you're on Dialup it can take a minute or two.
Simplissimo
[king]
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 11:28 am
by barrett
OK General Simplissimo...i've just tried the Nordenstam shelter route and after 20 minutes of uploading ,i get the same *The page cannot be displayed* page as i get when trying to upload onto Photobucket (which ive been attempting for the last week or so...) [fire]
Its not like its a full page glossy multi=color photo,just a simple 4 and a half inch square b/w tif. pic.
I feel so frigging stoopid 
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:12 pm
by sound world
Does your scanner let you save things as jpgs? That might be the answer.
Or...email it to me (
sound_world@hotmail.com) as a Tiff and I'll have a go.
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 8:45 pm
by aftersea
here's the easiest way to do it:
http://www.imageshack.us
upload your image, then copy/paste one of the links they'll give you("direct link to image" is nice)
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 11:04 pm
by barrett
sound world wrote:Does your scanner let you save things as jpgs? That might be the answer.
Or...email it to me (
sound_world@hotmail.com) as a Tiff and I'll have a go.
I give up .It s bigger than the 1mb attachment limit i can send so i'll send you a copy by good old fashioned snail mail...you are at still the same address Dave,i assume?
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 5:57 am
by kuhn
sound world wrote:Kuhn-did you ever put up the third photo?
And is someone going to translate the full article?
[b)] I forgot [:xx]
I'll look for the magazine and do it TODAY!
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:19 am
by sound world
barrett wrote:sound world wrote:Does your scanner let you save things as jpgs? That might be the answer.
Or...email it to me (
sound_world@hotmail.com) as a Tiff and I'll have a go.
I give up .It s bigger than the 1mb attachment limit i can send so i'll send you a copy by good old fashioned snail mail...you are at still the same address Dave,i assume?
Yep.
Don't you have Hotmail,John? I get a 10mb attachment on mine...?
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 12:41 pm
by kuhn
barrett wrote:OK General Simplissimo...i've just tried the Nordenstam shelter route and after 20 minutes of uploading ,i get the same *The page cannot be displayed* page as i get when trying to upload onto Photobucket (which ive been attempting for the last week or so...) [fire]
Its not like its a full page glossy multi=color photo,just a simple 4 and a half inch square b/w tif. pic.
I feel so frigging stoopid
http://www.yousendit.com
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 12:51 pm
by kuhn
Slitz, February/ March 1992 (Sweden).
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 2:37 pm
by sound world
Very nice!
What does that mean...jazz is sexy? Too right.
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 7:01 pm
by kuhn
sound world wrote:Very nice!
What does that mean...jazz is sexy? Too right.
Yes - "jazz is sexy" - Slitz was slightly sleazy even then! [:o]
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 10:32 pm
by wirbel
great picture; it does look a bit sexy, but certainly beautiful as ever
but what's that in the text i think is saying this record "being good to have sex with" ??? [crazy]
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 1:13 am
by TravisB
Great photo Kuhn,
Do you have a larger sized jpeg/tiff of it?
I know the Nordenstam Shelter is currently being a bit strangled by Yahoo limits, so was wondering if you could email me a copy of the original file (pleeeaase!) so I could upload it there personally, if you had no objections?
Cheers,
TravisB.
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 10:43 am
by kuhn
wirbel wrote:
but what's that in the text i think is saying this record "being good to have sex with" ??? [crazy]
Correct - [:xx]
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 10:43 am
by kuhn
TravisB wrote:Great photo Kuhn,
Do you have a larger sized jpeg/tiff of it?
I know the Nordenstam Shelter is currently being a bit strangled by Yahoo limits, so was wondering if you could email me a copy of the original file (pleeeaase!) so I could upload it there personally, if you had no objections?
Cheers,
TravisB.
Sure.